Rascasse Audience Intelligence

Eva Mendes Audience in United States

Eva Mendes has an estimated audience of 6.2M people in United States.

#199among Actor Actress or TV Star in United States
#506among people in United States#549in Movies & TV

The average Eva Mendes fan in United States is 42.3 years old, more female, and lives primarily in California.

Its fans are 2.7 years older than the group average of 39.6.

Women make up 63.0% of the fan base, 5.9 percentage points more than the group average.

Compared with the other 6628 objects in Actor Actress or TV Star, Eva Mendes fans stand out for their interest in Rodrigo Santoro, Jose Ramírez and Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge.

Most fans live in California, Texas, Florida.

Top affinities include Rodrigo Santoro, Jose Ramírez, Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge, with strongest over-indexing on Rodrigo Santoro (68.6× the country average).

Demographically, the Eva Mendes audience skews more female with an average age of 42.3, and over-indexes on personality traits such as Design Affinity, Tradition.

The typical Eva Mendes fan in United States is more female, around 42.3 years old, with strong Design Affinity tendencies and a notable affinity for Rodrigo Santoro.

Category: Movies & TV · Type: Person · Subtype: Actor Actress or TV Star

Data status: Q3/2026 · Source & method

Section 01

At a glance

Audience size
6.2M
in United States
Gender
63.0%♀
37.0% male
Age
42.3
average years
Country rank
#5663
among all objects in United States
Fig. 01

Search interest · 12-month trend

+60%
vs. last year
JanMarMayJulSepNov
Monthly searches · Source: Rascasse Solution
Section 02

Demographics of Eva Mendes fans

63.0% are female, 37.0% are male, average age 42.3.

Fig. 02

Gender split

63.0%
Female
37.0%
Male
Demographic split for Eva Mendes audience in United States
MetricValue
Female63.0%
Male37.0%
Average age42.3
Estimated audience size6.2M
Fig. 03

Age distribution

Ø 42.3
average years
Age distribution of the Eva Mendes audience in United States
Age bracketShare%
16-2412%
25-3416%
35-4425%
45-5428%
55+19%
Fig. 04

Worldwide distribution

30.7%

of the worldwide Eva Mendes audience comes from United States.

Worldwide audience distribution share by country for Eva Mendes
CountryShare
United States30.7%
France6.4%
Brazil5.7%
Section 03
Affinity (×) = how much more likely a member of this audience is to live in a region than the United States average. Example: 2.0× means twice as concentrated as the national baseline.

Geography

Fig. 05

Top regions by affinity

Eva Mendes fans by region: top regions in United States
#RegionReachAffinity×
01Arizona~200K1.37×
02California~900K1.26×
03Utah~80K1.25×
04New Mexico~50K1.22×
05Nevada~70K1.17×
06Texas~500K1.14×
07Colorado~100K1.14×
08Florida~400K1.13×
09Idaho~40K1.13×
10Washington~200K1.10×
11Hawaii~30K1.10×
12Oregon~90K1.09×
13Alaska~10K1.07×
14Illinois~200K1.06×
15Oklahoma~80K1.04×
16New Jersey~200K1.03×
17Connecticut~70K1.03×
18New York~400K1.02×
19Missouri~100K1.02×
20North Carolina~200K1.00×
21Michigan~200K1.00×
22Alabama~90K1.00×
23Kansas~50K1.00×
24Minnesota~100K0.99×
25Georgia~200K0.98×
26Montana~20K0.98×
27Tennessee~100K0.97×
28Nebraska~30K0.97×
29Massachusetts~100K0.96×
30Indiana~100K0.96×
31Wisconsin~100K0.96×
32Pennsylvania~200K0.95×
33Virginia~200K0.95×
34Maryland~100K0.95×
35Iowa~60K0.95×
36Ohio~200K0.94×
37Kentucky~80K0.94×
38Arkansas~50K0.94×
39South Carolina~90K0.91×
40Rhode Island~20K0.91×
41Louisiana~80K0.90×
42New Hampshire~20K0.90×
43North Dakota~10K0.89×
44Maine~20K0.86×
45Delaware~20K0.86×
46South Dakota~10K0.86×
47Washington, District of Columbia~10K0.86×
48Vermont~10K0.84×
49West Virginia~30K0.83×
50Mississippi~40K0.82×
Fig. 06

Affinity by region

Affinity by region — Eva Mendes, United States
0.82×1.00×1.37×
Section 04
Brands and objects ranked by affinity with this audience. Values above 1.0× mean over-representation compared with the country average.

Audience interests & affinities

Fig. 07

Top cross-interests, ranked by affinity

Affinities of the Eva Mendes audience vs. the country average
#·InterestCategoryAffinity×
01Rodrigo SantoroMovies & TV68.60×
02Jose RamírezSports67.62×
03Dilwale Dulhania Le JayengeMovies & TV60.10×
04Bride of FrankensteinMovies & TV58.79×
05Olympique de MarseilleSports52.58×
06Raúl (footballer)Sports46.21×
07Cain VelasquezSports45.03×
08Corpse BrideMovies & TV37.56×
09DakarTravel & Leisure31.88×
10New York & CompanyBusiness & Career20.39×
11Yao MingSports15.69×
12Pedro PascalMovies & TV15.59×
13Jessica BielMovies & TV15.01×
14Antonio BanderasMovies & TV14.20×
15Kirsten DunstMovies & TV14.07×
16Adriana LimaFashion & Accessoires14.02×
17Peter CullenMovies & TV10.70×
18Ryan GoslingMovies & TV8.93×
19Salma HayekMovies & TV7.20×
20Benson BooneMusic & Radio7.20×
Section 05
Strongest and weakest personality traits of this audience (1.0 = country average).

Personality of the Eva Mendes audience

Fig. 08

Deviation from the national baseline

↑ What stands out
The strongest tendencies
Personality traits of the Eva Mendes audience vs. the country average · What stands out
TraitClusterDeviationScore
Design AffinityPREMIUM1.35×
TraditionCONSERVATISM1.32×
ExtroversionTHRILL1.31×
0×1.00× baseline2×
↓ Rather not
The weakest tendencies
Personality traits of the Eva Mendes audience vs. the country average · Rather not
TraitClusterDeviationScore
PatriotismCONSERVATISM0.96×
Need for SecurityCONSERVATISM1.02×
Social Media UsageJOY1.06×
0×1.00× baseline2×
Appendix

Explore more audiences

Source & method

Source
Rascasse Solution, own modelling
What “fans” means here
Estimated number of people in United States with measurable interest in Eva Mendes over the last 12 months. Modelled, not counted; people interested in several persons count for each of them.
Data basis
Anonymised behavioural signals: search demand, social media signals, sponsorship and event data. Not a survey.
Period
10/2025 – 09/2026 · updated quarterly · data status Q3/2026
Confidence
high gender and age data available and an audience of at least 100,000 people

Cite as: “Rascasse Solution, Q3/2026, rascasse.com/explore/us/eva-mendes-13786” · Methodology