Rascasse Audience Intelligence

Alice in Chains Audience in United States

Alice in Chains has an estimated audience of 2.3M people in United States.

The average Alice in Chains fan in United States is 39.7 years old, more male, and lives primarily in California.

By number of fans, Alice in Chains ranks #36 among the 1309 objects in Rock in United States — 1.3× the group median.

Its fans are 3.1 years younger than the group average of 42.8.

Women make up 35.7% of the fan base, 10.5 percentage points fewer than the group average.

Compared with the other 1308 objects in Rock, Alice in Chains fans stand out for their interest in Dragon Quest X, Temple of the Dog and Audioslave.

Most fans live in California, Texas, Florida.

Top affinities include Dragon Quest X, Temple of the Dog, Soundgarden, with strongest over-indexing on Dragon Quest X (102.26× the country average).

Demographically, the Alice in Chains audience skews more male with an average age of 39.7, and over-indexes on personality traits such as Extroversion, Patriotism.

The typical Alice in Chains fan in United States is more male, around 39.7 years old, with strong Extroversion tendencies and a notable affinity for Dragon Quest X.

Category: Music & Radio · Type: Person · Subtype: Rock

Data status: Q3/2026 · Source & method

Section 01

At a glance

Audience size
2.3M
in United States
Gender
35.7%♀
64.3% male
Age
39.7
average years
Country rank
#12999
among all objects in United States
Fig. 01

Search interest · 12-month trend

-7%
vs. last year
JanMarMayJulSepNov
Monthly searches · Source: Rascasse Solution
Section 02

Demographics of Alice in Chains fans

35.7% are female, 64.3% are male, average age 39.7.

Fig. 02

Gender split

35.7%
Female
64.3%
Male
Demographic split for Alice in Chains audience in United States
MetricValue
Female35.7%
Male64.3%
Average age39.7
Estimated audience size2.3M
Fig. 03

Age distribution

Ø 39.7
average years
Age distribution of the Alice in Chains audience in United States
Age bracketShare%
16-2420%
25-3417%
35-4421%
45-5426%
55+16%
Fig. 04

Worldwide distribution

42.5%

of the worldwide Alice in Chains audience comes from United States.

Worldwide audience distribution share by country for Alice in Chains
CountryShare
United States42.5%
Brazil10.0%
United Kingdom5.6%
Section 03
Affinity (×) = how much more likely a member of this audience is to live in a region than the United States average. Example: 2.0× means twice as concentrated as the national baseline.

Geography

Fig. 05

Top regions by affinity

Alice in Chains fans by region: top regions in United States
#RegionReachAffinity×
01Kentucky~40K1.42×
02West Virginia~20K1.41×
03Washington~70K1.38×
04Maine~10K1.29×
05Oklahoma~30K1.27×
06New Hampshire~10K1.26×
07Ohio~100K1.20×
08Oregon~30K1.19×
09Montana~9K1.19×
10Iowa~30K1.16×
11Tennessee~60K1.14×
12Indiana~50K1.14×
13Missouri~50K1.14×
14Pennsylvania~100K1.11×
15Wisconsin~40K1.09×
16Arkansas~20K1.09×
17North Dakota~6K1.09×
18Idaho~10K1.07×
19South Dakota~6K1.04×
20Louisiana~30K1.03×
21Alabama~40K1.02×
22Vermont~5K1.02×
23North Carolina~80K1.01×
24Michigan~70K0.99×
25Minnesota~40K0.99×
26Connecticut~20K0.99×
27Nebraska~10K0.99×
28Kansas~20K0.98×
29Mississippi~20K0.97×
30Massachusetts~50K0.96×
31South Carolina~40K0.96×
32New Mexico~10K0.96×
33Alaska~5K0.96×
34Rhode Island~7K0.95×
35Colorado~40K0.93×
36Illinois~80K0.92×
37Wyoming~4K0.92×
38Arizona~50K0.88×
39Utah~20K0.86×
40Georgia~70K0.85×
41Texas~100K0.84×
42Virginia~50K0.84×
43Nevada~20K0.82×
44Delaware~6K0.81×
45New Jersey~50K0.79×
46California~200K0.77×
47Florida~100K0.76×
48Maryland~30K0.74×
49New York~100K0.73×
50Hawaii~6K0.57×
Fig. 06

Affinity by region

Affinity by region — Alice in Chains, United States
0.57×1.00×1.42×
Section 04
Brands and objects ranked by affinity with this audience. Values above 1.0× mean over-representation compared with the country average.

Audience interests & affinities

Fig. 07

Top cross-interests, ranked by affinity

Affinities of the Alice in Chains audience vs. the country average
#·InterestCategoryAffinity×
01Dragon Quest XGames102.26×
02Temple of the DogMusic & Radio41.95×
03SoundgardenMusic & Radio39.45×
04Stone Temple PilotsMusic & Radio36.89×
05AudioslaveMusic & Radio34.35×
06Fuel (band)Music & Radio32.72×
07DeftonesMusic & Radio28.89×
08Rage Against the MachineMusic & Radio27.87×
09The Smashing PumpkinsMusic & Radio27.13×
10Eddie VedderMusic & Radio26.03×
11ToolMusic & Radio24.98×
12Pearl JamMusic & Radio24.75×
13Chris CornellMusic & Radio22.15×
14Nirvana (band)Music & Radio21.46×
15Alice Cooper (band)Music & Radio20.38×
16Scorpions (band)Music & Radio19.51×
17Limp BizkitMusic & Radio19.09×
18Kurt CobainMusic & Radio16.56×
19EvanescenceMusic & Radio15.81×
20CAKEMusic & Radio13.04×
Section 05
Strongest and weakest personality traits of this audience (1.0 = country average).

Personality of the Alice in Chains audience

Fig. 08

Deviation from the national baseline

↑ What stands out
The strongest tendencies
Personality traits of the Alice in Chains audience vs. the country average · What stands out
TraitClusterDeviationScore
ExtroversionTHRILL1.65×
PatriotismCONSERVATISM1.36×
TraditionCONSERVATISM1.30×
0×1.00× baseline2×
↓ Rather not
The weakest tendencies
Personality traits of the Alice in Chains audience vs. the country average · Rather not
TraitClusterDeviationScore
Design AffinityPREMIUM0.79×
Luxury OrientationPREMIUM0.82×
Healthy LifestyleBALANCE0.95×
0×1.00× baseline2×
Appendix

Explore more audiences

Source & method

Source
Rascasse Solution, own modelling
What “fans” means here
Estimated number of people in United States with measurable interest in Alice in Chains over the last 12 months. Modelled, not counted; people interested in several persons count for each of them.
Data basis
Anonymised behavioural signals: search demand, social media signals, sponsorship and event data. Not a survey.
Period
10/2025 – 09/2026 · updated quarterly · data status Q3/2026
Confidence
high gender and age data available and an audience of at least 100,000 people

Cite as: “Rascasse Solution, Q3/2026, rascasse.com/explore/us/alice-in-chains-18001” · Methodology