Dries van Noten has an estimated audience of 1.5M people in United States.
The average Dries van Noten fan in United States is 29.4 years old, more female, and lives primarily in New York.
By number of fans, Dries van Noten ranks #11 among the 333 objects in Fashion designer in United States — 4.6× the group median.
Its fans are 10.3 years younger than the group average of 39.7.
Most fans live in New York, California, Texas.
65.0% are female, 35.0% are male, average age 29.4.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Female | 65.0% |
| Male | 35.0% |
| Average age | 29.4 |
| Estimated audience size | 1.5M |
| Age bracket | Share | % |
|---|---|---|
| 16-24 | 51% | |
| 25-34 | 23% | |
| 35-44 | 12% | |
| 45-54 | 9% | |
| 55+ | 6% |
of the worldwide Dries van Noten audience comes from United States.
| Country | Share |
|---|---|
| United States | 22.9% |
| China | 19.7% |
| Japan | 18.8% |
| # | Region | Reach | Affinity | × |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | New York | ~500K | 5.49× | |
| 02 | Washington, District of Columbia | ~10K | 3.07× | |
| 03 | California | ~500K | 2.68× | |
| 04 | Massachusetts | ~60K | 1.84× | |
| 05 | New Jersey | ~70K | 1.78× | |
| 06 | Connecticut | ~20K | 1.49× | |
| 07 | Washington | ~50K | 1.44× | |
| 08 | Maryland | ~40K | 1.40× | |
| 09 | Illinois | ~70K | 1.26× | |
| 10 | Georgia | ~60K | 1.21× | |
| 11 | Rhode Island | ~6K | 1.20× | |
| 12 | Virginia | ~40K | 1.13× | |
| 13 | Oregon | ~20K | 1.11× | |
| 14 | Hawaii | ~7K | 1.09× | |
| 15 | Pennsylvania | ~60K | 1.04× | |
| 16 | Vermont | ~3K | 1.04× | |
| 17 | Florida | ~100K | 1.03× | |
| 18 | Delaware | ~5K | 1.03× | |
| 19 | Texas | ~100K | 1.01× | |
| 20 | Colorado | ~30K | 0.98× | |
| 21 | Nevada | ~10K | 0.97× | |
| 22 | Louisiana | ~20K | 0.92× | |
| 23 | Maine | ~6K | 0.90× | |
| 24 | Alaska | ~3K | 0.85× | |
| 25 | North Carolina | ~40K | 0.83× | |
| 26 | North Dakota | ~3K | 0.83× | |
| 27 | Arizona | ~30K | 0.82× | |
| 28 | New Mexico | ~8K | 0.82× | |
| 29 | South Dakota | ~3K | 0.82× | |
| 30 | New Hampshire | ~5K | 0.80× | |
| 31 | Montana | ~4K | 0.79× | |
| 32 | Michigan | ~40K | 0.78× | |
| 33 | Minnesota | ~20K | 0.77× | |
| 34 | Tennessee | ~20K | 0.75× | |
| 35 | Utah | ~10K | 0.75× | |
| 36 | South Carolina | ~20K | 0.74× | |
| 37 | West Virginia | ~6K | 0.74× | |
| 38 | Missouri | ~20K | 0.72× | |
| 39 | Idaho | ~6K | 0.72× | |
| 40 | Mississippi | ~9K | 0.68× | |
| 41 | Nebraska | ~6K | 0.68× | |
| 42 | Arkansas | ~9K | 0.67× | |
| 43 | Alabama | ~10K | 0.65× | |
| 44 | Oklahoma | ~10K | 0.65× | |
| 45 | Kansas | ~9K | 0.65× | |
| 46 | Ohio | ~30K | 0.63× | |
| 47 | Kentucky | ~10K | 0.62× | |
| 48 | Iowa | ~9K | 0.62× | |
| 49 | Indiana | ~20K | 0.61× | |
| 50 | Wisconsin | ~20K | 0.61× |
Cite as: “Rascasse Solution, Q2/2026, rascasse.com/explore/us/dries-van-noten-4030” · Methodology