Charlotte FC has an estimated audience of 1.6M people in United States.
The average Charlotte FC fan in United States is 41.0 years old, more male, and lives primarily in North Carolina.
Its fans are 7.2 years older than the group average of 33.8.
Women make up 32.1% of the fan base, 2.4 percentage points fewer than the group average.
Interest is seasonal: March, May and August account for 39% of the year's searches, December is the quietest month.
Most fans live in North Carolina, South Carolina, Florida.
32.1% are female, 67.9% are male, average age 41.0.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Female | 32.1% |
| Male | 67.9% |
| Average age | 41.0 |
| Estimated audience size | 1.6M |
| Age bracket | Share | % |
|---|---|---|
| 16-24 | 15% | |
| 25-34 | 18% | |
| 35-44 | 23% | |
| 45-54 | 23% | |
| 55+ | 19% |
of the worldwide Charlotte FC audience comes from United States.
| Country | Share |
|---|---|
| United States | 51.6% |
| Mexico | 8.3% |
| Brazil | 7.7% |
| # | Region | Reach | Affinity | × |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | North Carolina | ~1M | 23.77× | |
| 02 | South Carolina | ~200K | 5.85× | |
| 03 | Georgia | ~50K | 0.92× | |
| 04 | Virginia | ~40K | 0.86× | |
| 05 | Tennessee | ~30K | 0.81× | |
| 06 | Washington, District of Columbia | ~3K | 0.79× | |
| 07 | Florida | ~80K | 0.75× | |
| 08 | Alaska | ~3K | 0.74× | |
| 09 | Vermont | ~2K | 0.69× | |
| 10 | Delaware | ~3K | 0.64× | |
| 11 | Rhode Island | ~3K | 0.63× | |
| 12 | North Dakota | ~2K | 0.61× | |
| 13 | Ohio | ~30K | 0.59× | |
| 14 | New Jersey | ~30K | 0.59× | |
| 15 | West Virginia | ~5K | 0.58× | |
| 16 | South Dakota | ~2K | 0.58× | |
| 17 | New York | ~50K | 0.57× | |
| 18 | Maryland | ~20K | 0.57× | |
| 19 | Montana | ~3K | 0.55× | |
| 20 | Kentucky | ~10K | 0.54× | |
| 21 | Connecticut | ~9K | 0.53× | |
| 22 | New Hampshire | ~3K | 0.53× | |
| 23 | Maine | ~3K | 0.51× | |
| 24 | Massachusetts | ~20K | 0.48× | |
| 25 | Nevada | ~7K | 0.47× | |
| 26 | Hawaii | ~3K | 0.47× | |
| 27 | Alabama | ~10K | 0.46× | |
| 28 | Nebraska | ~4K | 0.45× | |
| 29 | Idaho | ~4K | 0.45× | |
| 30 | Mississippi | ~6K | 0.44× | |
| 31 | Kansas | ~6K | 0.44× | |
| 32 | Illinois | ~30K | 0.43× | |
| 33 | Indiana | ~10K | 0.43× | |
| 34 | Oregon | ~9K | 0.43× | |
| 35 | New Mexico | ~4K | 0.43× | |
| 36 | Pennsylvania | ~30K | 0.42× | |
| 37 | Arizona | ~10K | 0.41× | |
| 38 | Utah | ~6K | 0.41× | |
| 39 | Colorado | ~10K | 0.40× | |
| 40 | Iowa | ~6K | 0.40× | |
| 41 | Arkansas | ~6K | 0.40× | |
| 42 | Washington | ~10K | 0.38× | |
| 43 | Louisiana | ~8K | 0.38× | |
| 44 | California | ~70K | 0.37× | |
| 45 | Texas | ~40K | 0.36× | |
| 46 | Missouri | ~10K | 0.36× | |
| 47 | Oklahoma | ~7K | 0.35× | |
| 48 | Minnesota | ~9K | 0.33× | |
| 49 | Wisconsin | ~8K | 0.30× | |
| 50 | Michigan | ~10K | 0.29× |
Cite as: “Rascasse Solution, Q3/2026, rascasse.com/explore/us/charlotte-fc-10009212” · Methodology