Rascasse Audience Intelligence

FC Dallas Fan Demographics in United States

FC Dallas has an estimated audience of 698K people in United States.

#239among Soccer in United States
#465among teams in United States#2869in Sports

The average FC Dallas fan in United States is 36.3 years old, more male, and lives primarily in Texas.

Its fans are 2.0 years older than the group average of 34.3.

Women make up 24.4% of the fan base, 10.2 percentage points fewer than the group average.

Compared with the other 13539 objects in Soccer, FC Dallas fans stand out for their interest in Brighton & Hove Albion F.C., Toyota Stadium (Texas) and Panama national football team.

Interest is seasonal: July, August and October account for 37% of the year's searches, December is the quietest month.

Most fans live in Texas, California, Florida.

Top affinities include Brighton & Hove Albion F.C., Toyota Stadium (Texas), Panama national football team, with strongest over-indexing on Brighton & Hove Albion F.C. (255.12× the country average).

Demographically, the FC Dallas audience skews more male with an average age of 36.3, and over-indexes on personality traits such as Tradition, Patriotism.

The typical FC Dallas fan in United States is more male, around 36.3 years old, with strong Tradition tendencies and a notable affinity for Brighton & Hove Albion F.C..

Category: Sports · Type: Team · Subtype: Soccer

Data status: Q2/2026 · Source & method

Section 01

At a glance

Audience size
698K
in United States
Gender
24.4%♀
75.6% male
Age
36.3
average years
Country rank
#29999
among all objects in United States
Fig. 01

Search interest · 12-month trend

-11%
vs. last year
JanMarMayJulSepNov
Monthly searches · Source: Rascasse Solution
Section 02

Demographics of FC Dallas fans

24.4% are female, 75.6% are male, average age 36.3.

Fig. 02

Gender split

24.4%
Female
75.6%
Male
Demographic split for FC Dallas audience in United States
MetricValue
Female24.4%
Male75.6%
Average age36.3
Estimated audience size698K
Fig. 03

Age distribution

Ø 36.3
average years
Age distribution of the FC Dallas audience in United States
Age bracketShare%
16-2427%
25-3422%
35-4421%
45-5418%
55+12%
Fig. 04

Worldwide distribution

36.3%

of the worldwide FC Dallas audience comes from United States.

Worldwide audience distribution share by country for FC Dallas
CountryShare
United States36.3%
Indonesia10.8%
Mexico6.9%
Section 03
Affinity (×) = how much more likely a member of this audience is to live in a region than the United States average. Example: 2.0× means twice as concentrated as the national baseline.

Geography

Fig. 05

Top regions by affinity

FC Dallas fans by region: top regions in United States
#RegionReachAffinity×
01Texas~500K12.83×
02Oklahoma~20K2.04×
03Oregon~10K1.62×
04Utah~10K1.54×
05Arkansas~8K1.29×
06Kansas~7K1.15×
07Colorado~10K1.07×
08Louisiana~10K1.04×
09Missouri~10K1.02×
10New Mexico~4K1.00×
11Washington~20K0.99×
12Wyoming~1K0.99×
13Montana~2K0.97×
14Washington, District of Columbia~1K0.91×
15California~70K0.89×
16North Dakota~1K0.88×
17South Dakota~2K0.87×
18Ohio~20K0.84×
19Nevada~6K0.84×
20Rhode Island~2K0.84×
21Delaware~2K0.82×
22Nebraska~3K0.81×
23Alaska~1K0.81×
24Florida~40K0.80×
25Mississippi~5K0.78×
26Minnesota~9K0.76×
27New Hampshire~2K0.74×
28Iowa~5K0.73×
29Idaho~3K0.73×
30Kentucky~7K0.71×
31Hawaii~2K0.71×
32Maryland~9K0.69×
33Maine~2K0.69×
34Arizona~10K0.68×
35Virginia~10K0.67×
36Tennessee~10K0.67×
37West Virginia~3K0.67×
38New Jersey~10K0.66×
39Illinois~20K0.64×
40Indiana~9K0.64×
41Connecticut~5K0.64×
42New York~30K0.63×
43Wisconsin~7K0.61×
44Massachusetts~9K0.58×
45Alabama~6K0.55×
46North Carolina~10K0.53×
47Georgia~10K0.51×
48South Carolina~5K0.47×
49Pennsylvania~10K0.43×
50Michigan~9K0.41×
Fig. 06

Affinity by region

Affinity by region — FC Dallas, United States
0.41×1.00×12.83×
Section 04
Brands and objects ranked by affinity with this audience. Values above 1.0× mean over-representation compared with the country average.

Audience interests & affinities

Fig. 07

Top cross-interests, ranked by affinity

Affinities of the FC Dallas audience vs. the country average
#·InterestCategoryAffinity×
01Brighton & Hove Albion F.C.Sports255.12×
02Toyota Stadium (Texas)Sports248.25×
03Panama national football teamSports209.77×
04Jacob JacksonSports156.72×
05Julio EncisoSports90.99×
06Marc CucurellaSports89.27×
07Roberto De ZerbiSports67.48×
08C.S.D. MunicipalSports54.52×
09Me Before YouMovies & TV23.68×
10Dallas StarsSports22.86×
11Ruben GallegoPolitics & Society15.77×
12Xavier BecerraPolitics & Society15.06×
13National Women's Soccer LeagueSports13.92×
14Texas Rangers (baseball)Sports9.44×
15Liga MXSports8.40×
16Creative CommonsTechnology & Electronics6.81×
17FIFA World Cup 2026Sports6.03×
18FIFA World CupSports4.93×
19Dick Van DykeMovies & TV4.68×
Section 05
Strongest and weakest personality traits of this audience (1.0 = country average).

Personality of the FC Dallas audience

Fig. 08

Deviation from the national baseline

↑ What stands out
The strongest tendencies
Personality traits of the FC Dallas audience vs. the country average · What stands out
TraitClusterDeviationScore
TraditionCONSERVATISM3.08×
PatriotismCONSERVATISM1.64×
Price SensitivityPREMIUM1.64×
0×1.00× baseline2×
↓ Rather not
The weakest tendencies
Personality traits of the FC Dallas audience vs. the country average · Rather not
TraitClusterDeviationScore
Pet OwnershipJOY0.84×
Design AffinityPREMIUM0.87×
CreativityOPEN0.90×
0×1.00× baseline2×
Appendix

Explore more audiences

Source & method

Source
Rascasse Solution, own modelling
What “fans” means here
Estimated number of people in United States with measurable interest in FC Dallas over the last 12 months. Modelled, not counted; people interested in several teams count for each of them.
Data basis
Anonymised behavioural signals: search demand, social media signals, sponsorship and event data. Not a survey.
Period
07/2025 – 06/2026 · updated quarterly · data status Q2/2026
Confidence
high gender and age data available and an audience of at least 100,000 people

Cite as: “Rascasse Solution, Q2/2026, rascasse.com/explore/us/fc-dallas-192” · Methodology