Rascasse Audience Intelligence

James Marriott Audience in United States

James Marriott has an estimated audience of 92K people in United States.

#1739among Singer-songwriter in United States
#21195among people in United States#12692in Music & Radio

The average James Marriott fan in United States is 34.4 years old, balanced, and lives primarily in California.

Its fans are 3.4 years younger than the group average of 37.8.

Women make up 48.4% of the fan base, 9.5 percentage points fewer than the group average.

Compared with the other 7686 objects in Singer-songwriter, James Marriott fans stand out for their interest in Placebo (band), Twenty One Pilots and Panic! at the Disco.

Most fans live in California, New York, Texas.

Top affinities include Placebo (band), Twenty One Pilots, Panic! at the Disco, with strongest over-indexing on Placebo (band) (33.23× the country average).

Demographically, the James Marriott audience skews balanced with an average age of 34.4, and over-indexes on personality traits such as Patriotism, Tradition.

The typical James Marriott fan in United States is balanced, around 34.4 years old, with strong Patriotism tendencies and a notable affinity for Placebo (band).

Category: Music & Radio · Type: Person · Subtype: Singer-songwriter

Data status: Q2/2026 · Source & method

Section 01

At a glance

Audience size
92K
in United States
Gender
48.4%♀
51.6% male
Age
34.4
average years
Country rank
#81213
among all objects in United States
Fig. 01

Search interest · 12-month trend

-51%
vs. last year
JanMarMayJulSepNov
Monthly searches · Source: Rascasse Solution
Section 02

Demographics of James Marriott fans

48.4% are female, 51.6% are male, average age 34.4.

Fig. 02

Gender split

48.4%
Female
51.6%
Male
Demographic split for James Marriott audience in United States
MetricValue
Female48.4%
Male51.6%
Average age34.4
Estimated audience size92K
Fig. 03

Age distribution

Ø 34.4
average years
Age distribution of the James Marriott audience in United States
Age bracketShare%
16-2436%
25-3421%
35-4415%
45-5415%
55+13%
Fig. 04

Worldwide distribution

18.9%

of the worldwide James Marriott audience comes from United States.

Worldwide audience distribution share by country for James Marriott
CountryShare
United Kingdom53.4%
United States18.9%
Australia7.1%
Section 03
Affinity (×) = how much more likely a member of this audience is to live in a region than the United States average. Example: 2.0× means twice as concentrated as the national baseline.

Geography

Fig. 05

Top regions by affinity

James Marriott fans by region: top regions in United States
#RegionReachAffinity×
01Utah~1K1.36×
02Washington~3K1.35×
03Massachusetts~3K1.32×
04Minnesota~2K1.26×
05Oregon~1K1.20×
06Maine<1K1.20×
07West Virginia<1K1.12×
08Indiana~2K1.09×
09New Hampshire<1K1.09×
10Colorado~2K1.08×
11Oklahoma~1K1.07×
12New York~6K1.04×
13Rhode Island<1K1.04×
14Vermont<1K1.03×
15Pennsylvania~4K1.02×
16Idaho<1K1.02×
17South Dakota<1K1.02×
18Washington, District of Columbia<1K1.02×
19Michigan~3K1.01×
20Kentucky~1K1.00×
21Connecticut<1K1.00×
22Nebraska<1K1.00×
23North Dakota<1K1.00×
24Iowa<1K0.99×
25Alaska<1K0.99×
26Ohio~3K0.98×
27Arkansas<1K0.98×
28Illinois~3K0.97×
29Kansas<1K0.97×
30Montana<1K0.97×
31Delaware<1K0.96×
32Virginia~2K0.95×
33Missouri~2K0.95×
34Wisconsin~2K0.95×
35Arizona~2K0.93×
36Nevada<1K0.93×
37New Mexico<1K0.93×
38Alabama~1K0.92×
39Hawaii<1K0.92×
40Texas~6K0.91×
41Tennessee~2K0.91×
42Mississippi<1K0.91×
43California~10K0.89×
44Maryland~2K0.89×
45New Jersey~2K0.87×
46South Carolina~1K0.87×
47Louisiana~1K0.86×
48Georgia~3K0.83×
49North Carolina~2K0.82×
50Florida~4K0.73×
Fig. 06

Affinity by region

Affinity by region — James Marriott, United States
0.73×1.00×1.36×
Section 04
Brands and objects ranked by affinity with this audience. Values above 1.0× mean over-representation compared with the country average.

Audience interests & affinities

Fig. 07

Top cross-interests, ranked by affinity

Affinities of the James Marriott audience vs. the country average
#·InterestCategoryAffinity×
01Placebo (band)Music & Radio33.23×
02Twenty One PilotsMusic & Radio31.82×
03Panic! at the DiscoMusic & Radio21.23×
04Good CharlotteMusic & Radio19.90×
05ElectropopMusic & Radio19.59×
06The HivesMusic & Radio19.23×
07U2Music & Radio17.42×
08Pierce the VeilMusic & Radio16.93×
09Santana (band)Music & Radio15.28×
10ParamoreMusic & Radio13.30×
11Goo Goo DollsMusic & Radio12.92×
12Green DayMusic & Radio10.62×
13GorillazMusic & Radio8.81×
14Hayley WilliamsMusic & Radio8.00×
15Genesis (band)Music & Radio5.85×
16MonstersMovies & TV5.76×
17Ozzy OsbourneMusic & Radio5.15×
18Sabrina CarpenterMusic & Radio4.58×
19Millie Bobby BrownMovies & TV3.78×
20SupermanMovies & TV2.20×
Section 05
Strongest and weakest personality traits of this audience (1.0 = country average).

Personality of the James Marriott audience

Fig. 08

Deviation from the national baseline

↑ What stands out
The strongest tendencies
Personality traits of the James Marriott audience vs. the country average · What stands out
TraitClusterDeviationScore
PatriotismCONSERVATISM3.93×
TraditionCONSERVATISM1.94×
ExtroversionTHRILL1.57×
0×1.00× baseline2×
↓ Rather not
The weakest tendencies
Personality traits of the James Marriott audience vs. the country average · Rather not
TraitClusterDeviationScore
Quality AwarenessPREMIUM0.69×
Family OrientationCONSERVATISM0.78×
TravellingTHRILL0.83×
0×1.00× baseline2×
Appendix

Explore more audiences

Source & method

Source
Rascasse Solution, own modelling
What “fans” means here
Estimated number of people in United States with measurable interest in James Marriott over the last 12 months. Modelled, not counted; people interested in several persons count for each of them.
Data basis
Anonymised behavioural signals: search demand, social media signals, sponsorship and event data. Not a survey.
Period
07/2025 – 06/2026 · updated quarterly · data status Q2/2026
Confidence
medium gender data available, but no age data or fewer than 100,000 people; read demographics as a tendency

Cite as: “Rascasse Solution, Q2/2026, rascasse.com/explore/us/james-marriott-10026902” · Methodology