Rascasse Audience Intelligence

Myles Turner Audience in United States

Myles Turner has an estimated audience of 2.6M people in United States.

#123among Basketball in United States
#1885among people in United States#1039in Sports

The average Myles Turner fan in United States is 34.3 years old, more male, and lives primarily in Indiana.

Its fans are 1.7 years older than the group average of 32.6.

Women make up 42.8% of the fan base, 3.0 percentage points more than the group average.

Compared with the other 2666 objects in Basketball, Myles Turner fans stand out for their interest in Reggie Jackson, Anime convention and Mixed martial arts.

Interest is seasonal: May, June and July account for 41% of the year's searches, September is the quietest month.

Most fans live in Indiana, Wisconsin, California.

Top affinities include Reggie Jackson, Chris Paul, Luka Dončić, with strongest over-indexing on Reggie Jackson (13.86× the country average).

Demographically, the Myles Turner audience skews more male with an average age of 34.3, and over-indexes on personality traits such as Early Adopter Mentality, Convenience Orientation.

The typical Myles Turner fan in United States is more male, around 34.3 years old, with strong Early Adopter Mentality tendencies and a notable affinity for Reggie Jackson.

Category: Sports · Type: Person · Subtype: Basketball

Data status: Q3/2026 · Source & method

Section 01

At a glance

Audience size
2.6M
in United States
Gender
42.8%♀
57.2% male
Age
34.3
average years
Country rank
#11941
among all objects in United States
Fig. 01

Search interest · 12-month trend

-40%
vs. last year
JanMarMayJulSepNov
Monthly searches · Source: Rascasse Solution
Section 02

Demographics of Myles Turner fans

42.8% are female, 57.2% are male, average age 34.3.

Fig. 02

Gender split

42.8%
Female
57.2%
Male
Demographic split for Myles Turner audience in United States
MetricValue
Female42.8%
Male57.2%
Average age34.3
Estimated audience size2.6M
Fig. 03

Age distribution

Ø 34.3
average years
Age distribution of the Myles Turner audience in United States
Age bracketShare%
16-2437%
25-3420%
35-4416%
45-5414%
55+13%
Fig. 04

Worldwide distribution

74.8%

of the worldwide Myles Turner audience comes from United States.

Worldwide audience distribution share by country for Myles Turner
CountryShare
United States74.8%
Brazil5.0%
Canada4.6%
Section 03
Affinity (×) = how much more likely a member of this audience is to live in a region than the United States average. Example: 2.0× means twice as concentrated as the national baseline.

Geography

Fig. 05

Top regions by affinity

Myles Turner fans by region: top regions in United States
#RegionReachAffinity×
01Wisconsin~300K6.19×
02Indiana~300K5.95×
03Illinois~100K1.30×
04New York~200K1.15×
05Ohio~90K1.04×
06Massachusetts~60K1.03×
07Washington, District of Columbia~5K1.03×
08Louisiana~40K1.00×
09Oklahoma~30K1.00×
10Minnesota~40K0.98×
11New Jersey~70K0.97×
12Maryland~50K0.97×
13Connecticut~30K0.94×
14Georgia~80K0.93×
15Michigan~70K0.93×
16North Carolina~80K0.91×
17Kentucky~30K0.91×
18Iowa~20K0.91×
19California~300K0.90×
20Florida~100K0.90×
21Arizona~50K0.89×
22Tennessee~50K0.85×
23Rhode Island~7K0.85×
24Texas~100K0.84×
25Virginia~60K0.84×
26Delaware~6K0.84×
27South Carolina~30K0.83×
28Mississippi~20K0.83×
29Pennsylvania~80K0.81×
30Maine~8K0.81×
31Hawaii~9K0.80×
32New Hampshire~8K0.78×
33Missouri~40K0.77×
34Alabama~30K0.77×
35Nevada~20K0.76×
36Arkansas~20K0.76×
37North Dakota~4K0.75×
38Alaska~4K0.75×
39Vermont~4K0.75×
40South Dakota~5K0.74×
41Oregon~20K0.73×
42Kansas~20K0.71×
43Colorado~30K0.70×
44West Virginia~9K0.69×
45Nebraska~10K0.66×
46Montana~6K0.66×
47Utah~20K0.60×
48Washington~30K0.56×
49New Mexico~9K0.56×
50Idaho~8K0.55×
Fig. 06

Affinity by region

Affinity by region — Myles Turner, United States
0.55×1.00×6.19×
Section 04
Brands and objects ranked by affinity with this audience. Values above 1.0× mean over-representation compared with the country average.

Audience interests & affinities

Fig. 07

Top cross-interests, ranked by affinity

Affinities of the Myles Turner audience vs. the country average
#·InterestCategoryAffinity×
01Reggie JacksonSports13.86×
02Chris PaulSports4.33×
03Luka DončićSports3.77×
04Klay ThompsonSports3.58×
05Carmelo AnthonySports3.07×
06Giannis AntetokounmpoSports3.02×
07Minnesota TimberwolvesSports2.86×
08Brooklyn NetsSports2.68×
09Phoenix SunsSports2.67×
10Milwaukee BucksSports2.60×
11Houston RocketsSports2.57×
12LeBron JamesSports2.04×
13College basketballSports2.04×
14NBA FinalsSports2.00×
15NBA playoffsSports1.90×
16Golden State WarriorsSports1.88×
17Anime conventionLiterature1.88×
18Mixed martial artsSports1.71×
19Mobile gameGames1.61×
20Los Angeles LakersSports1.51×
Section 05
Strongest and weakest personality traits of this audience (1.0 = country average).

Personality of the Myles Turner audience

Fig. 08

Deviation from the national baseline

↑ What stands out
The strongest tendencies
Personality traits of the Myles Turner audience vs. the country average · What stands out
TraitClusterDeviationScore
Early Adopter MentalityPOWER1.21×
Convenience OrientationPREMIUM1.18×
IndulgenceJOY1.15×
0×1.00× baseline2×
↓ Rather not
The weakest tendencies
Personality traits of the Myles Turner audience vs. the country average · Rather not
TraitClusterDeviationScore
CreativityOPEN0.82×
SustainabilityBALANCE0.84×
MindfulnessBALANCE0.85×
0×1.00× baseline2×
Appendix

Explore more audiences

More Basketball audiences in United States

Source & method

Source
Rascasse Solution, own modelling
What “fans” means here
Estimated number of people in United States with measurable interest in Myles Turner over the last 12 months. Modelled, not counted; people interested in several persons count for each of them.
Data basis
Anonymised behavioural signals: search demand, social media signals, sponsorship and event data. Not a survey.
Period
10/2025 – 09/2026 · updated quarterly · data status Q3/2026
Confidence
high gender and age data available and an audience of at least 100,000 people

Cite as: “Rascasse Solution, Q3/2026, rascasse.com/explore/us/myles-turner-10127438” · Methodology