Rascasse Audience Intelligence

Ariana Grande Audience in United States

Ariana Grande has an estimated audience of 33.8M people in United States.

The average Ariana Grande fan in United States is 31.8 years old, more female, and lives primarily in California.

By number of fans, Ariana Grande ranks #4 among the 1578 objects in Pop in United States — 11.1× the group median.

Its fans are 8.2 years younger than the group average of 40.0.

Women make up 66.3% of the fan base, 7.5 percentage points more than the group average.

Compared with the other 1577 objects in Pop, Ariana Grande fans stand out for their interest in Skai Jackson, Ross Lynch and Adriana Lima.

Most fans live in California, Texas, Florida.

Top affinities include Skai Jackson, Ross Lynch, Adriana Lima, with strongest over-indexing on Skai Jackson (18.87× the country average).

Demographically, the Ariana Grande audience skews more female with an average age of 31.8, and over-indexes on personality traits such as Extroversion, Early Adopter Mentality.

The typical Ariana Grande fan in United States is more female, around 31.8 years old, with strong Extroversion tendencies and a notable affinity for Skai Jackson.

Category: Music & Radio · Type: Person · Subtype: Pop

Data status: Q3/2026 · Source & method

Section 01

At a glance

Audience size
33.8M
in United States
Gender
66.3%♀
33.7% male
Age
31.8
average years
Country rank
#752
among all objects in United States
Fig. 01

Search interest · 12-month trend

+66%
vs. last year
JanMarMayJulSepNov
Monthly searches · Source: Rascasse Solution
Section 02

Demographics of Ariana Grande fans

66.3% are female, 33.7% are male, average age 31.8.

Fig. 02

Gender split

66.3%
Female
33.7%
Male
Demographic split for Ariana Grande audience in United States
MetricValue
Female66.3%
Male33.7%
Average age31.8
Estimated audience size33.8M
Fig. 03

Age distribution

Ø 31.8
average years
Age distribution of the Ariana Grande audience in United States
Age bracketShare%
16-2442%
25-3424%
35-4415%
45-5411%
55+8%
Fig. 04

Worldwide distribution

32.5%

of the worldwide Ariana Grande audience comes from United States.

Worldwide audience distribution share by country for Ariana Grande
CountryShare
United States32.5%
United Kingdom7.3%
Germany5.8%
Section 03
Affinity (×) = how much more likely a member of this audience is to live in a region than the United States average. Example: 2.0× means twice as concentrated as the national baseline.

Geography

Fig. 05

Top regions by affinity

Ariana Grande fans by region: top regions in United States
#RegionReachAffinity×
01Utah~400K1.27×
02Connecticut~400K1.14×
03California~4.5M1.12×
04New Jersey~1M1.10×
05Massachusetts~800K1.10×
06Illinois~1.5M1.09×
07Florida~2.5M1.08×
08Washington~800K1.08×
09Texas~2.5M1.07×
10Pennsylvania~1.5M1.07×
11Idaho~200K1.07×
12New York~2M1.06×
13Oregon~500K1.06×
14New Mexico~200K1.06×
15Michigan~1M1.05×
16Maryland~700K1.05×
17Rhode Island~100K1.05×
18Ohio~1M1.04×
19Indiana~700K1.04×
20Nevada~300K1.04×
21Oklahoma~400K1.03×
22Missouri~600K1.02×
23Colorado~600K1.02×
24Minnesota~600K1.02×
25Georgia~1M1.01×
26Virginia~900K1.01×
27New Hampshire~100K1.01×
28North Carolina~1M1.00×
29Hawaii~100K1.00×
30Kentucky~400K0.99×
31Tennessee~700K0.98×
32Wisconsin~600K0.98×
33Louisiana~500K0.98×
34Arizona~700K0.97×
35Kansas~300K0.97×
36Nebraska~200K0.96×
37Iowa~300K0.95×
38Arkansas~300K0.95×
39Maine~100K0.95×
40South Carolina~500K0.94×
41West Virginia~200K0.94×
42Vermont~60K0.93×
43Delaware~90K0.91×
44Alabama~500K0.90×
45Mississippi~300K0.90×
46Washington, District of Columbia~60K0.89×
47Montana~100K0.87×
48North Dakota~70K0.87×
49South Dakota~70K0.83×
50Alaska~60K0.82×
Fig. 06

Affinity by region

Affinity by region — Ariana Grande, United States
0.82×1.00×1.27×
Section 04
Brands and objects ranked by affinity with this audience. Values above 1.0× mean over-representation compared with the country average.

Audience interests & affinities

Fig. 07

Top cross-interests, ranked by affinity

Affinities of the Ariana Grande audience vs. the country average
#·InterestCategoryAffinity×
01Skai JacksonMovies & TV18.87×
02Ross LynchMovies & TV18.31×
03Adriana LimaFashion & Accessoires15.84×
04Peyton ListMovies & TV13.38×
05Tate McRaeMusic & Radio11.45×
06Bhad BhabieMusic & Radio11.44×
07Hannah MontanaMusic & Radio11.22×
08Shawn MendesMusic & Radio10.97×
09Madison BeerMusic & Radio9.38×
10Harry StylesMusic & Radio9.17×
11ZendayaMovies & TV5.76×
12Selena GomezMovies & TV5.62×
13Digital illustrationArts & Culture5.42×
14Nicki MinajMusic & Radio5.37×
15Kylie JennerMovies & TV5.21×
16Billie EilishMusic & Radio5.00×
17Taylor SwiftMusic & Radio4.79×
18Fashion NovaShopping3.20×
19TikTokInternet & Social Media2.13×
20BeautyBeauty & Wellness1.75×
Section 05
Strongest and weakest personality traits of this audience (1.0 = country average).

Personality of the Ariana Grande audience

Fig. 08

Deviation from the national baseline

↑ What stands out
The strongest tendencies
Personality traits of the Ariana Grande audience vs. the country average · What stands out
TraitClusterDeviationScore
ExtroversionTHRILL1.70×
Early Adopter MentalityPOWER1.50×
Social Media UsageJOY1.45×
0×1.00× baseline2×
↓ Rather not
The weakest tendencies
Personality traits of the Ariana Grande audience vs. the country average · Rather not
TraitClusterDeviationScore
PatriotismCONSERVATISM0.68×
Need for SecurityCONSERVATISM0.70×
Community OrientationOPEN0.89×
0×1.00× baseline2×
Appendix

Explore more audiences

Source & method

Source
Rascasse Solution, own modelling
What “fans” means here
Estimated number of people in United States with measurable interest in Ariana Grande over the last 12 months. Modelled, not counted; people interested in several persons count for each of them.
Data basis
Anonymised behavioural signals: search demand, social media signals, sponsorship and event data. Not a survey.
Period
10/2025 – 09/2026 · updated quarterly · data status Q3/2026
Confidence
high gender and age data available and an audience of at least 100,000 people

Cite as: “Rascasse Solution, Q3/2026, rascasse.com/explore/us/ariana-grande-2632” · Methodology