Rascasse Audience Intelligence

Julia Wolf Audience in United States

Julia Wolf has an estimated audience of 957K people in United States.

#331among Singer-songwriter in United States
#5326among people in United States#2837in Music & Radio

The average Julia Wolf fan in United States is 30.0 years old, more female, and lives primarily in California.

Its fans are 6.9 years younger than the group average of 36.9.

Women make up 63.5% of the fan base, 5.6 percentage points more than the group average.

Compared with the other 7767 objects in Singer-songwriter, Julia Wolf fans stand out for their interest in Monogram, Lorde and Jonas Brothers.

Interest is seasonal: March, May and September account for 37% of the year's searches, November is the quietest month.

Most fans live in California, New York, Texas.

Top affinities include Monogram, Lorde, Jonas Brothers, with strongest over-indexing on Monogram (39.52× the country average).

Demographically, the Julia Wolf audience skews more female with an average age of 30.0, and over-indexes on personality traits such as Mindfulness, Extroversion.

The typical Julia Wolf fan in United States is more female, around 30.0 years old, with strong Mindfulness tendencies and a notable affinity for Monogram.

Category: Music & Radio · Type: Person · Subtype: Singer-songwriter

Data status: Q3/2026 · Source & method

Section 01

At a glance

Audience size
957K
in United States
Gender
63.5%♀
36.5% male
Age
30.0
average years
Country rank
#25203
among all objects in United States
Fig. 01

Search interest · 12-month trend

+90%
vs. last year
JanMarMayJulSepNov
Monthly searches · Source: Rascasse Solution
Section 02

Demographics of Julia Wolf fans

63.5% are female, 36.5% are male, average age 30.0.

Fig. 02

Gender split

63.5%
Female
36.5%
Male
Demographic split for Julia Wolf audience in United States
MetricValue
Female63.5%
Male36.5%
Average age30.0
Estimated audience size957K
Fig. 03

Age distribution

Ø 30.0
average years
Age distribution of the Julia Wolf audience in United States
Age bracketShare%
16-2441%
25-3431%
35-4415%
45-549%
55+4%
Fig. 04

Worldwide distribution

65.5%

of the worldwide Julia Wolf audience comes from United States.

Worldwide audience distribution share by country for Julia Wolf
CountryShare
United States65.5%
United Kingdom9.3%
Canada5.5%
Section 03
Affinity (×) = how much more likely a member of this audience is to live in a region than the United States average. Example: 2.0× means twice as concentrated as the national baseline.

Geography

Fig. 05

Top regions by affinity

Julia Wolf fans by region: top regions in United States
#RegionReachAffinity×
01New York~80K1.30×
02Massachusetts~20K1.23×
03Tennessee~20K1.21×
04Washington~30K1.19×
05North Carolina~40K1.15×
06Nebraska~6K1.13×
07Illinois~40K1.12×
08California~100K1.11×
09Florida~70K1.11×
10Pennsylvania~40K1.10×
11Georgia~40K1.10×
12Texas~70K1.09×
13Arizona~20K1.09×
14Kentucky~10K1.09×
15Oklahoma~10K1.09×
16Ohio~40K1.08×
17Indiana~20K1.08×
18Connecticut~10K1.08×
19Rhode Island~3K1.08×
20Michigan~30K1.06×
21New Jersey~30K1.06×
22Wisconsin~20K1.06×
23Colorado~20K1.05×
24Oregon~10K1.03×
25West Virginia~5K1.03×
26Louisiana~10K1.02×
27Nevada~9K1.01×
28Iowa~9K1.01×
29Arkansas~9K1.00×
30New Hampshire~4K0.99×
31Delaware~3K0.99×
32Utah~9K0.98×
33Alabama~10K0.96×
34Washington, District of Columbia~2K0.96×
35Alaska~2K0.94×
36Missouri~20K0.93×
37Maryland~20K0.92×
38Maine~4K0.91×
39Vermont~2K0.91×
40South Carolina~10K0.90×
41North Dakota~2K0.90×
42South Dakota~2K0.89×
43Kansas~7K0.88×
44Idaho~5K0.88×
45Wyoming~1K0.88×
46Minnesota~10K0.86×
47Mississippi~7K0.86×
48New Mexico~5K0.85×
49Montana~3K0.84×
50Hawaii~3K0.80×
Fig. 06

Affinity by region

Affinity by region — Julia Wolf, United States
0.80×1.00×1.30×
Section 04
Brands and objects ranked by affinity with this audience. Values above 1.0× mean over-representation compared with the country average.

Audience interests & affinities

Fig. 07

Top cross-interests, ranked by affinity

Affinities of the Julia Wolf audience vs. the country average
#·InterestCategoryAffinity×
01MonogramHome & Garden39.52×
02LordeMusic & Radio24.37×
03Jonas BrothersMusic & Radio19.20×
04Niall HoranMusic & Radio17.75×
05Charli XCXMusic & Radio17.04×
06Real Time with Bill MaherMovies & TV16.82×
07Zayn MalikMusic & Radio13.10×
08SeatGeekSports12.63×
09HalseyMusic & Radio12.22×
10Tyler, The CreatorMusic & Radio11.08×
11Madison BeerMusic & Radio10.08×
12Shawn MendesMusic & Radio9.95×
13Lindsay LohanMovies & TV8.06×
14Hailee SteinfeldMovies & TV7.15×
15Sabrina CarpenterMusic & Radio6.99×
16Kendall JennerFashion & Accessoires6.74×
17David HarbourMovies & TV6.45×
18Ariana GrandeMusic & Radio5.95×
19Britney SpearsMusic & Radio2.80×
20TikTokInternet & Social Media2.14×
Section 05
Strongest and weakest personality traits of this audience (1.0 = country average).

Personality of the Julia Wolf audience

Fig. 08

Deviation from the national baseline

↑ What stands out
The strongest tendencies
Personality traits of the Julia Wolf audience vs. the country average · What stands out
TraitClusterDeviationScore
MindfulnessBALANCE1.54×
ExtroversionTHRILL1.41×
Convenience OrientationPREMIUM1.33×
0×1.00× baseline2×
↓ Rather not
The weakest tendencies
Personality traits of the Julia Wolf audience vs. the country average · Rather not
TraitClusterDeviationScore
DIY MentalityTHRILL0.74×
Risk AppetiteTHRILL0.76×
Family OrientationCONSERVATISM0.78×
0×1.00× baseline2×
Appendix

Explore more audiences

Source & method

Source
Rascasse Solution, own modelling
What “fans” means here
Estimated number of people in United States with measurable interest in Julia Wolf over the last 12 months. Modelled, not counted; people interested in several persons count for each of them.
Data basis
Anonymised behavioural signals: search demand, social media signals, sponsorship and event data. Not a survey.
Period
10/2025 – 09/2026 · updated quarterly · data status Q3/2026
Confidence
high gender and age data available and an audience of at least 100,000 people

Cite as: “Rascasse Solution, Q3/2026, rascasse.com/explore/us/julia-wolf-10029166” · Methodology