Rascasse Audience Intelligence

FC Cartagena Fan Demographics in United States

FC Cartagena has an estimated audience of 6K people in United States.

#4766among Soccer in United States
#2844among teams in United States#19470in Sports

The average FC Cartagena fan in United States is 30.2 years old, balanced, and lives primarily in Florida.

Its fans are 3.6 years younger than the group average of 33.8.

Women make up 45.9% of the fan base, 11.4 percentage points more than the group average.

Compared with the other 13631 objects in Soccer, FC Cartagena fans stand out for their interest in Deportivo Alavés, Dynamo Dresden and Getafe CF.

Interest is seasonal: January, May and December account for 36% of the year's searches, June is the quietest month.

Most fans live in Florida, California, New York.

Top affinities include Deportivo Alavés, Dynamo Dresden, Getafe CF, with strongest over-indexing on Deportivo Alavés (217.16× the country average).

Demographically, the FC Cartagena audience skews balanced with an average age of 30.2, and over-indexes on personality traits such as Convenience Orientation, Price Sensitivity.

The typical FC Cartagena fan in United States is balanced, around 30.2 years old, with strong Convenience Orientation tendencies and a notable affinity for Deportivo Alavés.

Category: Sports · Type: Team · Subtype: Soccer

Data status: Q3/2026 · Source & method

Section 01

At a glance

Audience size
6K
in United States
Gender
45.9%♀
54.1% male
Age
30.2
average years
Country rank
#161857
among all objects in United States
Fig. 01

Search interest · 12-month trend

+47%
vs. last year
JanMarMayJulSepNov
Monthly searches · Source: Rascasse Solution
Section 02

Demographics of FC Cartagena fans

45.9% are female, 54.1% are male, average age 30.2.

Fig. 02

Gender split

45.9%
Female
54.1%
Male
Demographic split for FC Cartagena audience in United States
MetricValue
Female45.9%
Male54.1%
Average age30.2
Estimated audience size6K
Fig. 03

Age distribution

Ø 30.2
average years
Age distribution of the FC Cartagena audience in United States
Age bracketShare%
16-2445%
25-3425%
35-4416%
45-5410%
55+5%
Fig. 04

Worldwide distribution

0.4%

of the worldwide FC Cartagena audience comes from United States.

Worldwide audience distribution share by country for FC Cartagena
CountryShare
Spain34.9%
Colombia6.8%
Peru5.2%
Section 03
Affinity (×) = how much more likely a member of this audience is to live in a region than the United States average. Example: 2.0× means twice as concentrated as the national baseline.

Geography

Fig. 05

Top regions by affinity

FC Cartagena fans by region: top regions in United States
#RegionReachAffinity×
01Florida<1K1.60×
02Washington, District of Columbia<1K1.46×
03New Jersey<1K1.44×
04Maryland<1K1.38×
05Nevada<1K1.31×
06Vermont<1K1.28×
07Rhode Island<1K1.21×
08Alaska<1K1.17×
09Delaware<1K1.12×
10North Dakota<1K1.12×
11Massachusetts<1K1.10×
12New York<1K1.08×
13Virginia<1K1.06×
14South Dakota<1K1.06×
15Indiana<1K1.05×
16Maine<1K1.04×
17New Hampshire<1K1.04×
18Illinois<1K1.03×
19Nebraska<1K1.03×
20Montana<1K1.03×
21Connecticut<1K1.02×
22Hawaii<1K1.01×
23West Virginia<1K1.00×
24Mississippi<1K0.98×
25Iowa<1K0.97×
26New Mexico<1K0.97×
27Idaho<1K0.97×
28Louisiana<1K0.95×
29Kansas<1K0.95×
30Kentucky<1K0.94×
31Arkansas<1K0.93×
32Oklahoma<1K0.92×
33Arizona<1K0.91×
34Utah<1K0.91×
35Alabama<1K0.89×
36Oregon<1K0.89×
37Colorado<1K0.87×
38South Carolina<1K0.87×
39Missouri<1K0.86×
40Wisconsin<1K0.86×
41Tennessee<1K0.85×
42Minnesota<1K0.85×
43Pennsylvania<1K0.84×
44Texas<1K0.83×
45North Carolina<1K0.82×
46Washington<1K0.82×
47Georgia<1K0.81×
48Michigan<1K0.80×
49Ohio<1K0.78×
50California<1K0.74×
Fig. 06

Affinity by region

Affinity by region — FC Cartagena, United States
0.74×1.00×1.60×
Section 04
Brands and objects ranked by affinity with this audience. Values above 1.0× mean over-representation compared with the country average.

Audience interests & affinities

Fig. 07

Top cross-interests, ranked by affinity

Affinities of the FC Cartagena audience vs. the country average
#·InterestCategoryAffinity×
01Deportivo AlavésSports217.16×
02Dynamo DresdenSports141.99×
03Getafe CFSports37.21×
04Real SociedadSports36.64×
05Real BetisSports29.89×
06Sevilla FCSports27.85×
07Atlético MadridSports24.85×
08Colorado RockiesSports14.85×
09San Diego PadresSports11.93×
10Milwaukee BrewersSports11.56×
11Pittsburgh PiratesSports10.60×
12Paris Saint-GermainSports10.42×
13Detroit TigersSports7.74×
14La LigaSports7.60×
15Non-alcoholic beverageFood & Beverages6.78×
16ShakiraMusic & Radio6.67×
17FanaticsFashion & Accessoires5.66×
18Sports clubSports5.35×
19Solar energyHome & Garden4.70×
20Domino's PizzaFood & Beverages3.55×
Section 05
Strongest and weakest personality traits of this audience (1.0 = country average).

Personality of the FC Cartagena audience

Fig. 08

Deviation from the national baseline

↑ What stands out
The strongest tendencies
Personality traits of the FC Cartagena audience vs. the country average · What stands out
TraitClusterDeviationScore
Convenience OrientationPREMIUM2.26×
Price SensitivityPREMIUM2.00×
Urban LifestyleOPEN1.65×
0×1.00× baseline2×
↓ Rather not
The weakest tendencies
Personality traits of the FC Cartagena audience vs. the country average · Rather not
TraitClusterDeviationScore
MindfulnessBALANCE0.46×
Pet OwnershipJOY0.48×
Design AffinityPREMIUM0.49×
0×1.00× baseline2×
Appendix

Explore more audiences

More Soccer audiences in United States

Source & method

Source
Rascasse Solution, own modelling
What “fans” means here
Estimated number of people in United States with measurable interest in FC Cartagena over the last 12 months. Modelled, not counted; people interested in several teams count for each of them.
Data basis
Anonymised behavioural signals: search demand, social media signals, sponsorship and event data. Not a survey.
Period
10/2025 – 09/2026 · updated quarterly · data status Q3/2026
Confidence
medium gender data available, but no age data or fewer than 100,000 people; read demographics as a tendency

Cite as: “Rascasse Solution, Q3/2026, rascasse.com/explore/us/fc-cartagena-78954” · Methodology