Rascasse Audience Intelligence

Biomedical technology Audience in United States

A data profile of the people who buy, follow and care about Biomedical technology in United States — modelled from more than twelve digital signal sources. Biomedical technology has an estimated audience of 267,955 people in United States.

#13934among Topic in United States#1223in Health

The average Biomedical technology fan in United States is 41.3 years old, balanced, and lives primarily in California.

The audience is concentrated in California, Texas, North Carolina.

Top brand affinities include Elsevier, Biomedical engineering, Cardiology, with strongest over-indexing on Elsevier (177.57× the country average).

Demographically, the Biomedical technology audience skews balanced with an average age of 41.3, and over-indexes on personality traits such as Patriotism, Career Orientation.

Compared to the country baseline, this audience shows distinctive patterns across 20 brand affinities and 50 regions tracked by Rascasse.

The typical Biomedical technology fan in United States is balanced, around 41.3 years old, with strong Patriotism tendencies and a notable affinity for Elsevier.

Category: Health · Type: Topic

The data on this page comes from the Rascasse audience panel and is refreshed monthly from search, social and browsing signals. As of 2026-08-10.

Section 01

At a glance

The key figures that characterise the Biomedical technology profile in United States.

Audience size
268K
in United States
Gender
52.2%♀
47.8% male
Age
41.3
average years
Country rank
#51158
Topic in United States
Fig. 01

Search interest · 12-month trend

-8%
vs. last year
JanMarMayJulSepNov
Monthly searches · Source: Rascasse Audience Intelligence
Section 02

Demographics of Biomedical technology fans

52.2% are female, 47.8% are male, average age 41.3.

Fig. 02

Gender split

52.2%
Female
47.8%
Male
Demographic split for Biomedical technology audience in United States
MetricValue
Female52.2%
Male47.8%
Average age41.3
Estimated audience size267,955
Fig. 03

Age distribution

Ø 41.3
average years
Age distribution of the Biomedical technology audience in United States
Age bracketShare%
16-1918%
20-2915%
30-3919%
40-4920%
50+27%
Fig. 04

Worldwide distribution

25.7%

of the worldwide Biomedical technology audience comes from United States.

Worldwide audience distribution share by country for Biomedical technology
CountryShare
United States25.7%
India9.8%
Saudi Arabia9.6%
Section 03
Affinity (×) = how much more likely a member of this audience is to live in a region than the United States average. Example: 2.0× means twice as concentrated as the national baseline.

Geography

Where the Biomedical technology audience in United States is strongest.

Fig. 05

Top regions by affinity

Biomedical technology fans by region: top regions in United States
#RegionReachAffinity×
01North Carolina~20K2.63×
02Alaska<1K1.27×
03North Dakota<1K1.21×
04Vermont<1K1.20×
05South Dakota<1K1.19×
06Montana<1K1.12×
07Delaware<1K1.07×
08West Virginia~1K1.06×
09Rhode Island<1K1.05×
10Maine<1K1.04×
11New Hampshire~1K1.03×
12Arizona~6K1.02×
13Hawaii~1K1.02×
14Idaho~1K1.00×
15Washington, District of Columbia<1K1.00×
16Mississippi~2K0.99×
17Texas~20K0.98×
18Georgia~8K0.98×
19New Mexico~1K0.98×
20Nebraska~1K0.97×
21Virginia~6K0.95×
22Alabama~4K0.95×
23Louisiana~3K0.95×
24Arkansas~2K0.95×
25Oklahoma~3K0.93×
26Kansas~2K0.93×
27New Jersey~6K0.92×
28Minnesota~4K0.92×
29Iowa~2K0.92×
30Kentucky~3K0.91×
31Nevada~2K0.90×
32Utah~2K0.90×
33Maryland~4K0.89×
34South Carolina~4K0.89×
35Wisconsin~4K0.89×
36Oregon~3K0.89×
37Connecticut~2K0.89×
38Missouri~4K0.88×
39Tennessee~5K0.86×
40Indiana~4K0.86×
41Pennsylvania~8K0.85×
42Washington~5K0.85×
43California~20K0.83×
44Colorado~3K0.83×
45Massachusetts~4K0.82×
46Illinois~7K0.81×
47Michigan~6K0.81×
48Ohio~6K0.78×
49Florida~10K0.76×
50New York~10K0.76×
Fig. 06

Affinity by region

Affinity by region — Biomedical technology, United States
0.76×1.00×2.63×
Section 04
Brands and entities this audience over-indexes on, vs. the country average.

Audience interests & affinities

The strongest cross-interests of the Biomedical technology audience — brands, topics and people combined.

Fig. 07

Top cross-interests, ranked by affinity

Top brand affinities (over-index vs. country average) for Biomedical technology audience
#·InterestCategoryAffinity×
01ElsevierLiterature177.57×
02Biomedical engineeringBusiness & Career82.47×
03Arabic coffeeFood & Beverages15.08×
04Borussia DortmundSports15.08×
05Vera FarmigaMovies & TV15.08×
06Katharine McPheeMovies & TV15.08×
07Mohamed SalahSports15.08×
08Hair tutorialsBeauty & Wellness14.50×
09Internet of ThingsBusiness & Career14.31×
10CardiologyHealth13.77×
11Axl RoseMusic & Radio11.83×
12Doctor of MedicineBusiness & Career9.50×
13United States national football teamSports9.30×
14Disneyland ParisTravel & Leisure6.44×
15FedExBusiness & Career3.08×
16Planet FitnessSports2.22×
17Google DriveTechnology & Electronics2.18×
18Indeed.comBusiness & Career2.13×
19PinterestInternet & Social Media1.77×
20ShoesFashion & Accessoires1.59×
Section 05
Top six personality traits over-indexed by this audience (1.0 = country average).

Personality of the Biomedical technology audience

Values above 1.00× are above the country average, values below 1.00× below it.

Fig. 08

Deviation from the national baseline

↑ What stands out
The strongest tendencies
Top personality traits over-indexed by Biomedical technology audience · What stands out
TraitClusterDeviationScore
PatriotismCONSERVATISM2.36×
Career OrientationPOWER1.85×
Need for SecurityCONSERVATISM1.76×
0×1.00× baseline2×
↓ Rather not
The weakest tendencies
Top personality traits over-indexed by Biomedical technology audience · Rather not
TraitClusterDeviationScore
ExtroversionTHRILL0.84×
CreativityOPEN0.93×
Healthy LifestyleBALANCE0.94×
0×1.00× baseline2×
Section 06

Frequently asked questions

01

How many fans does Biomedical technology have in United States?

Biomedical technology has an estimated audience of 267,955 people in United States, concentrated in California and Texas.

02

What is the gender split and age of Biomedical technology fans?

52.2% of Biomedical technology fans are female, 47.8% are male, with an average age of 41.3 years.

03

Which brands do Biomedical technology fans like most?

Biomedical technology fans show strongest brand affinity for Elsevier (177.57×), Biomedical engineering (82.47×), and Cardiology (13.77×) over the country average.

04

Where do Biomedical technology fans live in United States?

Biomedical technology fans in United States are most concentrated in California (reach ~20K), Texas (reach ~20K), and North Carolina (reach ~20K). These three regions account for the largest share of the active audience.

05

What other brands do Biomedical technology fans also like?

Beyond Biomedical technology itself, the audience over-indexes on Biomedical engineering (82.47×), Cardiology (13.77×), Hair tutorials (14.5×), and Doctor of Medicine (9.5×) compared to the United States average.

Appendix

Explore more audiences

Related profiles, rankings and the same audience in other markets.

More Health audiences in United States

See Biomedical technology audiences in other countries

How to read this data

Audience size is the estimated number of people in United States who actively search for Biomedical technology. Affinity is an over-index ratio: 2.0× means the audience is twice as likely to engage with that brand or trait as the country average. Reach is the estimated number of audience members in a region. Regional and brand-affinity tables are sorted from strongest signal to weakest.

About this audience profile

This audience profile is generated by Rascasse from anonymized search-behavior signals across United States. For methodology see methodology. Affinity values are over-index ratios vs. the country average (1.0 = baseline). Audience sizes are estimated, not measured.

Scale & coverage
500,000+ ready-to-use audiences across 170+ countries

From global mass-market brands to niche local segments — explore the full library and see which intelligence layers are included.

See pricing →