A data profile of the people who buy, follow and care about Functional Fitness in United States — modelled from more than twelve digital signal sources. Functional Fitness has an estimated audience of 321,382 people in United States.
The average Functional Fitness fan in United States is 30.8 years old, balanced, and lives primarily in Virginia.
The audience is concentrated in Virginia, California, Texas.
Top brand affinities include Gina Carano, Freddie Freeman, High intensity training, with strongest over-indexing on Gina Carano (11.79× the country average).
Demographically, the Functional Fitness audience skews balanced with an average age of 30.8, and over-indexes on personality traits such as Patriotism, Mindfulness.
Compared to the country baseline, this audience shows distinctive patterns across 20 brand affinities and 50 regions tracked by Rascasse.
The typical Functional Fitness fan in United States is balanced, around 30.8 years old, with strong Patriotism tendencies and a notable affinity for Gina Carano.
The key figures that characterise the Functional Fitness profile in United States.
46.8% are female, 53.2% are male, average age 30.8.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Female | 46.8% |
| Male | 53.2% |
| Average age | 30.8 |
| Estimated audience size | 321,382 |
| Age bracket | Share | % |
|---|---|---|
| 16-19 | 40% | |
| 20-29 | 24% | |
| 30-39 | 19% | |
| 40-49 | 13% | |
| 50+ | 4% |
Where the Functional Fitness audience in United States is strongest.
| # | Region | Reach | Affinity | × |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Virginia | ~80K | 10.43× | |
| 02 | Kansas | ~10K | 4.14× | |
| 03 | Colorado | ~8K | 1.55× | |
| 04 | Minnesota | ~6K | 1.37× | |
| 05 | Alaska | <1K | 1.23× | |
| 06 | Tennessee | ~8K | 1.20× | |
| 07 | Oregon | ~4K | 1.09× | |
| 08 | New Hampshire | ~1K | 1.09× | |
| 09 | Wisconsin | ~5K | 1.06× | |
| 10 | Indiana | ~6K | 1.05× | |
| 11 | Vermont | <1K | 0.99× | |
| 12 | Maine | ~1K | 0.97× | |
| 13 | Montana | <1K | 0.96× | |
| 14 | North Dakota | <1K | 0.96× | |
| 15 | South Dakota | <1K | 0.95× | |
| 16 | Rhode Island | <1K | 0.94× | |
| 17 | Washington, District of Columbia | <1K | 0.94× | |
| 18 | Nevada | ~3K | 0.93× | |
| 19 | Delaware | <1K | 0.93× | |
| 20 | Idaho | ~1K | 0.92× | |
| 21 | West Virginia | ~1K | 0.92× | |
| 22 | Hawaii | ~1K | 0.92× | |
| 23 | Mississippi | ~2K | 0.91× | |
| 24 | Alabama | ~4K | 0.90× | |
| 25 | New Mexico | ~1K | 0.90× | |
| 26 | Nebraska | ~1K | 0.90× | |
| 27 | Arkansas | ~2K | 0.88× | |
| 28 | Utah | ~2K | 0.85× | |
| 29 | Iowa | ~2K | 0.85× | |
| 30 | Oklahoma | ~3K | 0.84× | |
| 31 | North Carolina | ~8K | 0.83× | |
| 32 | Washington | ~5K | 0.83× | |
| 33 | Louisiana | ~3K | 0.83× | |
| 34 | Connecticut | ~3K | 0.83× | |
| 35 | Kentucky | ~3K | 0.82× | |
| 36 | Massachusetts | ~5K | 0.81× | |
| 37 | Maryland | ~4K | 0.81× | |
| 38 | South Carolina | ~4K | 0.79× | |
| 39 | Missouri | ~4K | 0.78× | |
| 40 | Illinois | ~8K | 0.76× | |
| 41 | California | ~30K | 0.75× | |
| 42 | Arizona | ~5K | 0.75× | |
| 43 | Ohio | ~7K | 0.70× | |
| 44 | Georgia | ~7K | 0.69× | |
| 45 | Michigan | ~6K | 0.69× | |
| 46 | New York | ~10K | 0.68× | |
| 47 | New Jersey | ~6K | 0.68× | |
| 48 | Florida | ~10K | 0.67× | |
| 49 | Pennsylvania | ~7K | 0.66× | |
| 50 | Texas | ~20K | 0.59× |
The strongest cross-interests of the Functional Fitness audience — brands, topics and people combined.
| # | · | Interest | Category | Affinity | × |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | High intensity training | Sports | 26.72× | ||
| 02 | Freddie Freeman | Sports | 20.11× | ||
| 03 | Erin Andrews | Sports | 20.00× | ||
| 04 | Anderson Silva | Sports | 20.00× | ||
| 05 | Cain Velasquez | Sports | 18.04× | ||
| 06 | Khabib Nurmagomedov | Sports | 14.28× | ||
| 07 | Biohacking | Technology & Electronics | 13.63× | ||
| 08 | Kettlebell | Sports | 13.25× | ||
| 09 | Gina Carano | Movies & TV | 11.79× | ||
| 10 | Calisthenics | Sports | 11.07× | ||
| 11 | Shimano | Cars & Mobility | 10.70× | ||
| 12 | Anthony Joshua | Sports | 9.29× | ||
| 13 | Eva Mendes | Movies & TV | 6.69× | ||
| 14 | 24 Hour Fitness | Sports | 5.56× | ||
| 15 | Motorcycle accessories | Cars & Mobility | 4.85× | ||
| 16 | Atlanta Braves | Sports | 4.10× | ||
| 17 | Anytime Fitness | Sports | 4.10× | ||
| 18 | CrossFit | Sports | 3.46× | ||
| 19 | Physical fitness | Sports | 2.40× | ||
| 20 | Fitness and wellness | Sports | 1.57× |
Values above 1.00× are above the country average, values below 1.00× below it.
| Trait | Cluster | Deviation | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patriotism | CONSERVATISM | 4.27× | |
| Mindfulness | BALANCE | 2.22× | |
| Risk Appetite | THRILL | 1.91× |
| Trait | Cluster | Deviation | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indulgence | JOY | 0.71× | |
| Creativity | OPEN | 0.74× | |
| Spirituality | BALANCE | 0.85× |
Functional Fitness has an estimated audience of 321,382 people in United States, concentrated in Virginia and California.
46.8% of Functional Fitness fans are female, 53.2% are male, with an average age of 30.8 years.
Functional Fitness fans show strongest brand affinity for Gina Carano (11.79×), Freddie Freeman (20.11×), and High intensity training (26.72×) over the country average.
Functional Fitness fans in United States are most concentrated in Virginia (reach ~80K), California (reach ~30K), and Texas (reach ~20K). These three regions account for the largest share of the active audience.
Beyond Functional Fitness itself, the audience over-indexes on Freddie Freeman (20.11×), High intensity training (26.72×), Calisthenics (11.07×), and Physical fitness (2.4×) compared to the United States average.
Related profiles, rankings and the same audience in other markets.
Audience size is the estimated number of people in United States who actively search for Functional Fitness. Affinity is an over-index ratio: 2.0× means the audience is twice as likely to engage with that brand or trait as the country average. Reach is the estimated number of audience members in a region. Regional and brand-affinity tables are sorted from strongest signal to weakest.
This audience profile is generated by Rascasse from anonymized search-behavior signals across United States. For methodology see methodology. Affinity values are over-index ratios vs. the country average (1.0 = baseline). Audience sizes are estimated, not measured.
From global mass-market brands to niche local segments — explore the full library and see which intelligence layers are included.