A data profile of the people who buy, follow and care about Water pollution in United States — modelled from more than twelve digital signal sources. Water pollution has an estimated audience of 2,425,155 people in United States.
The average Water pollution fan in United States is 40.9 years old, more male, and lives primarily in Texas.
The audience is concentrated in Texas, California, Georgia.
Top brand affinities include Water quality, Water supply, Lindsey Graham, with strongest over-indexing on Water quality (31.81× the country average).
Demographically, the Water pollution audience skews more male with an average age of 40.9, and over-indexes on personality traits such as Sustainability, Community Orientation.
Compared to the country baseline, this audience shows distinctive patterns across 20 brand affinities and 50 regions tracked by Rascasse.
The typical Water pollution fan in United States is more male, around 40.9 years old, with strong Sustainability tendencies and a notable affinity for Water quality.
The key figures that characterise the Water pollution profile in United States.
41.0% are female, 59.0% are male, average age 40.9.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Female | 41.0% |
| Male | 59.0% |
| Average age | 40.9 |
| Estimated audience size | 2,425,155 |
| Age bracket | Share | % |
|---|---|---|
| 16-19 | 19% | |
| 20-29 | 16% | |
| 30-39 | 18% | |
| 40-49 | 21% | |
| 50+ | 26% |
Where the Water pollution audience in United States is strongest.
| # | Region | Reach | Affinity | × |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Georgia | ~200K | 3.01× | |
| 02 | Texas | ~400K | 1.72× | |
| 03 | Virginia | ~90K | 1.59× | |
| 04 | North Carolina | ~100K | 1.53× | |
| 05 | South Carolina | ~50K | 1.45× | |
| 06 | Hawaii | ~20K | 1.44× | |
| 07 | Connecticut | ~30K | 1.22× | |
| 08 | Florida | ~200K | 1.18× | |
| 09 | Maryland | ~50K | 1.18× | |
| 10 | Iowa | ~20K | 1.15× | |
| 11 | Arizona | ~50K | 1.08× | |
| 12 | Wisconsin | ~40K | 1.08× | |
| 13 | Kentucky | ~30K | 1.07× | |
| 14 | New York | ~100K | 1.06× | |
| 15 | Indiana | ~50K | 1.06× | |
| 16 | Alabama | ~40K | 1.05× | |
| 17 | Pennsylvania | ~80K | 1.03× | |
| 18 | Kansas | ~20K | 1.02× | |
| 19 | West Virginia | ~10K | 1.02× | |
| 20 | Washington, District of Columbia | ~7K | 1.00× | |
| 21 | North Dakota | ~5K | 1.00× | |
| 22 | South Dakota | ~5K | 0.98× | |
| 23 | California | ~300K | 0.97× | |
| 24 | New Jersey | ~60K | 0.97× | |
| 25 | Washington | ~50K | 0.96× | |
| 26 | Idaho | ~10K | 0.96× | |
| 27 | Illinois | ~80K | 0.95× | |
| 28 | Vermont | ~4K | 0.94× | |
| 29 | Minnesota | ~30K | 0.93× | |
| 30 | Nebraska | ~10K | 0.92× | |
| 31 | Michigan | ~60K | 0.90× | |
| 32 | Missouri | ~40K | 0.90× | |
| 33 | Nevada | ~20K | 0.89× | |
| 34 | Oklahoma | ~20K | 0.88× | |
| 35 | Mississippi | ~20K | 0.88× | |
| 36 | New Mexico | ~10K | 0.88× | |
| 37 | Maine | ~8K | 0.88× | |
| 38 | Massachusetts | ~40K | 0.87× | |
| 39 | Arkansas | ~20K | 0.87× | |
| 40 | Louisiana | ~30K | 0.86× | |
| 41 | New Hampshire | ~8K | 0.86× | |
| 42 | Alaska | ~4K | 0.86× | |
| 43 | Tennessee | ~40K | 0.85× | |
| 44 | Rhode Island | ~6K | 0.84× | |
| 45 | Delaware | ~6K | 0.84× | |
| 46 | Colorado | ~30K | 0.81× | |
| 47 | Oregon | ~20K | 0.81× | |
| 48 | Montana | ~5K | 0.81× | |
| 49 | Ohio | ~60K | 0.77× | |
| 50 | Utah | ~20K | 0.69× |
The strongest cross-interests of the Water pollution audience — brands, topics and people combined.
| # | · | Interest | Category | Affinity | × |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Environmental movement | Politics & Society | 32.58× | ||
| 02 | Water quality | Home & Garden | 31.81× | ||
| 03 | Environmental issue | Politics & Society | 27.31× | ||
| 04 | Water supply | Politics & Society | 23.77× | ||
| 05 | Effects of global warming | Politics & Society | 23.58× | ||
| 06 | Sewage treatment | Home & Garden | 18.00× | ||
| 07 | Water treatment | Home & Garden | 17.54× | ||
| 08 | Water resources | Politics & Society | 15.89× | ||
| 09 | Wastewater | Home & Garden | 13.09× | ||
| 10 | Wildlife trade | Politics & Society | 11.95× | ||
| 11 | Supreme court | Politics & Society | 11.29× | ||
| 12 | Money (magazine) | Business & Career | 10.22× | ||
| 13 | Susan Collins | Politics & Society | 8.17× | ||
| 14 | Pollution | Health | 7.93× | ||
| 15 | Social change | Politics & Society | 6.27× | ||
| 16 | Waste | Home & Garden | 5.72× | ||
| 17 | Lindsey Graham | Politics & Society | 5.48× | ||
| 18 | Sustainable energy | Home & Garden | 5.30× | ||
| 19 | Mitch McConnell | Politics & Society | 3.00× | ||
| 20 | Nature | Home & Garden | 2.19× |
Values above 1.00× are above the country average, values below 1.00× below it.
| Trait | Cluster | Deviation | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sustainability | BALANCE | 2.69× | |
| Community Orientation | OPEN | 1.90× | |
| Patriotism | CONSERVATISM | 1.75× |
| Trait | Cluster | Deviation | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Indulgence | JOY | 0.85× | |
| Luxury Orientation | PREMIUM | 0.87× | |
| Extroversion | THRILL | 0.97× |
Water pollution has an estimated audience of 2,425,155 people in United States, concentrated in Texas and California.
41.0% of Water pollution fans are female, 59.0% are male, with an average age of 40.9 years.
Water pollution fans show strongest brand affinity for Water quality (31.81×), Water supply (23.77×), and Lindsey Graham (5.48×) over the country average.
Water pollution fans in United States are most concentrated in Texas (reach ~400K), California (reach ~300K), and Georgia (reach ~200K). These three regions account for the largest share of the active audience.
Beyond Water pollution itself, the audience over-indexes on Water supply (23.77×), Lindsey Graham (5.48×), Effects of global warming (23.58×), and Environmental issue (27.31×) compared to the United States average.
Related profiles, rankings and the same audience in other markets.
Audience size is the estimated number of people in United States who actively search for Water pollution. Affinity is an over-index ratio: 2.0× means the audience is twice as likely to engage with that brand or trait as the country average. Reach is the estimated number of audience members in a region. Regional and brand-affinity tables are sorted from strongest signal to weakest.
This audience profile is generated by Rascasse from anonymized search-behavior signals across United States. For methodology see methodology. Affinity values are over-index ratios vs. the country average (1.0 = baseline). Audience sizes are estimated, not measured.
From global mass-market brands to niche local segments — explore the full library and see which intelligence layers are included.