A data profile of the people who buy, follow and care about MIT Technology Review in United States — modelled from more than twelve digital signal sources. MIT Technology Review has an estimated audience of 1,685,966 people in United States.
The average MIT Technology Review fan in United States is 43.6 years old, balanced, and lives primarily in California.
The audience is concentrated in California, New York, Massachusetts.
Top brand affinities include Google Drive, Eurostar, Dropbox (service), with strongest over-indexing on Google Drive (61.83× the country average).
Demographically, the MIT Technology Review audience skews balanced with an average age of 43.6, and over-indexes on personality traits such as Early Adopter Mentality, Sustainability.
Compared to the country baseline, this audience shows distinctive patterns across 20 brand affinities and 50 regions tracked by Rascasse.
The typical MIT Technology Review fan in United States is balanced, around 43.6 years old, with strong Early Adopter Mentality tendencies and a notable affinity for Google Drive.
The key figures that characterise the MIT Technology Review profile in United States.
50.2% are female, 49.8% are male, average age 43.6.
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Female | 50.2% |
| Male | 49.8% |
| Average age | 43.6 |
| Estimated audience size | 1,685,966 |
| Age bracket | Share | % |
|---|---|---|
| 16-19 | 9% | |
| 20-29 | 17% | |
| 30-39 | 20% | |
| 40-49 | 24% | |
| 50+ | 29% |
of the worldwide MIT Technology Review audience comes from United States.
| Country | Share |
|---|---|
| United States | 48.9% |
| Japan | 9.3% |
| United Kingdom | 8.3% |
Where the MIT Technology Review audience in United States is strongest.
| # | Region | Reach | Affinity | × |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Massachusetts | ~200K | 4.54× | |
| 02 | Washington, District of Columbia | ~20K | 4.20× | |
| 03 | New York | ~200K | 2.00× | |
| 04 | California | ~300K | 1.79× | |
| 05 | Washington | ~50K | 1.61× | |
| 06 | Virginia | ~60K | 1.41× | |
| 07 | New Jersey | ~60K | 1.37× | |
| 08 | Connecticut | ~20K | 1.32× | |
| 09 | Maryland | ~40K | 1.27× | |
| 10 | Oregon | ~20K | 1.20× | |
| 11 | New Hampshire | ~8K | 1.15× | |
| 12 | Vermont | ~3K | 1.15× | |
| 13 | Illinois | ~60K | 1.14× | |
| 14 | Rhode Island | ~6K | 1.09× | |
| 15 | Colorado | ~30K | 1.08× | |
| 16 | Maine | ~7K | 1.08× | |
| 17 | Pennsylvania | ~60K | 0.97× | |
| 18 | Alaska | ~3K | 0.96× | |
| 19 | North Carolina | ~50K | 0.94× | |
| 20 | North Dakota | ~3K | 0.94× | |
| 21 | South Dakota | ~4K | 0.93× | |
| 22 | Utah | ~10K | 0.91× | |
| 23 | Montana | ~4K | 0.91× | |
| 24 | Delaware | ~4K | 0.91× | |
| 25 | Hawaii | ~7K | 0.90× | |
| 26 | New Mexico | ~8K | 0.89× | |
| 27 | West Virginia | ~7K | 0.87× | |
| 28 | Idaho | ~7K | 0.86× | |
| 29 | Texas | ~100K | 0.85× | |
| 30 | Mississippi | ~10K | 0.85× | |
| 31 | Nebraska | ~7K | 0.84× | |
| 32 | Georgia | ~40K | 0.82× | |
| 33 | Arkansas | ~10K | 0.82× | |
| 34 | Minnesota | ~20K | 0.81× | |
| 35 | Nevada | ~10K | 0.81× | |
| 36 | Kansas | ~10K | 0.81× | |
| 37 | Michigan | ~40K | 0.80× | |
| 38 | Iowa | ~10K | 0.79× | |
| 39 | Oklahoma | ~10K | 0.77× | |
| 40 | Indiana | ~20K | 0.76× | |
| 41 | Missouri | ~20K | 0.76× | |
| 42 | Wisconsin | ~20K | 0.76× | |
| 43 | Louisiana | ~20K | 0.75× | |
| 44 | Kentucky | ~20K | 0.75× | |
| 45 | Arizona | ~30K | 0.74× | |
| 46 | Alabama | ~20K | 0.73× | |
| 47 | Tennessee | ~20K | 0.72× | |
| 48 | South Carolina | ~20K | 0.72× | |
| 49 | Florida | ~80K | 0.71× | |
| 50 | Ohio | ~40K | 0.68× |
The strongest cross-interests of the MIT Technology Review audience — brands, topics and people combined.
| # | · | Interest | Category | Affinity | × |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Sharp Aquos | Technology & Electronics | 141.05× | ||
| 02 | Eurostar | Cars & Mobility | 135.52× | ||
| 03 | LibreOffice | Technology & Electronics | 62.59× | ||
| 04 | Google Drive | Technology & Electronics | 61.83× | ||
| 05 | Bordeaux wine | Food & Beverages | 42.95× | ||
| 06 | A Million Ways to Die in the West | Movies & TV | 38.47× | ||
| 07 | AngelList | Business & Career | 33.34× | ||
| 08 | LiveScience | Business & Career | 33.18× | ||
| 09 | Dropbox (service) | Technology & Electronics | 24.57× | ||
| 10 | American Museum of Natural History | Arts & Culture | 21.58× | ||
| 11 | Key Food | Shopping | 20.74× | ||
| 12 | WordPress | Technology & Electronics | 16.59× | ||
| 13 | Sustainable energy | Home & Garden | 11.90× | ||
| 14 | Business school | Business & Career | 9.16× | ||
| 15 | Casino games | Games | 8.54× | ||
| 16 | Renewable energy | Business & Career | 8.48× | ||
| 17 | Internet & Social Media | 7.33× | |||
| 18 | Innovation | Business & Career | 6.58× | ||
| 19 | NASDAQ | Business & Career | 5.73× | ||
| 20 | The UPS Store | Shopping | 4.97× |
Values above 1.00× are above the country average, values below 1.00× below it.
| Trait | Cluster | Deviation | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Early Adopter Mentality | POWER | 3.90× | |
| Sustainability | BALANCE | 3.30× | |
| Family Orientation | CONSERVATISM | 2.42× |
| Trait | Cluster | Deviation | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Creativity | OPEN | 0.68× | |
| Pet Ownership | JOY | 0.76× | |
| Healthy Lifestyle | BALANCE | 0.78× |
MIT Technology Review has an estimated audience of 1,685,966 people in United States, concentrated in California and New York.
50.2% of MIT Technology Review fans are female, 49.8% are male, with an average age of 43.6 years.
MIT Technology Review fans show strongest brand affinity for Google Drive (61.83×), Eurostar (135.52×), and Dropbox (service) (24.57×) over the country average.
MIT Technology Review fans in United States are most concentrated in California (reach ~300K), New York (reach ~200K), and Massachusetts (reach ~200K). These three regions account for the largest share of the active audience.
Beyond MIT Technology Review itself, the audience over-indexes on Eurostar (135.52×), Dropbox (service) (24.57×), Sustainable energy (11.9×), and Bordeaux wine (42.95×) compared to the United States average.
Related profiles, rankings and the same audience in other markets.
Audience size is the estimated number of people in United States who actively search for MIT Technology Review. Affinity is an over-index ratio: 2.0× means the audience is twice as likely to engage with that brand or trait as the country average. Reach is the estimated number of audience members in a region. Regional and brand-affinity tables are sorted from strongest signal to weakest.
This audience profile is generated by Rascasse from anonymized search-behavior signals across United States. For methodology see methodology. Affinity values are over-index ratios vs. the country average (1.0 = baseline). Audience sizes are estimated, not measured.
From global mass-market brands to niche local segments — explore the full library and see which intelligence layers are included.